Like concurrent validity, predictive validity tests an assessment against a criterion.Unlike concurrent validity, this criterion exists in the future. Predictive Validity. The outcome measure, called a criterion, is the main variable of interest in the analysis. Predictive validity focuses on how well an assessment tool can predict the outcome of some other separate, but related, measure. Predictive validity studies take a long time to complete and require fairly large sample sizes in order to acquire meaningful aggregate data. These are discussed below: Type # 1. In order for a test to have predictive validity, there must be a statistically significant correlation between test scores and the criterion being used to measure the validity. For example, the validity of a cognitive test for job performance is the demonstrated relationship between test scores and supervisor performance ratings. It refers to the degree to which the results of a test correlate to the results of a related test that is administered sometime in the future. The most comprehensive meta-analysis by Frank Schmidt and John Hunter was recently updated (Schmidt, 2016): based on a gigantic data sample. Predictive validity is important in the business and academic sectors where selecting the right candidate or accepting the right students is important. The difference of the time period between the administering of the two tests allows the correlation to possess a predictive quality. Criterion validity describes how a test effectively estimates an examinee’s performance on some outcome measure(s). Predictive validity, or more specifically, the ability to predict medication effects—both positive and negative—is the most salient of the types of model validity (face, construct, and predictive) for the evaluation of potential medications. Criterion validity is split into two different types of outcomes: Predictive validity and concurrent validity. The following six types of validity are popularly in use viz., Face validity, Content validity, Predictive validity, Concurrent, Construct and Factorial validity. The test scores are truly useful if they can provide a basis for precise prediction of some criteria. There are two forms of criterion-related validity: predictive validity and concurrent validity. When the measurement we created has high predictive validity, we will be able to forecast a future scenario based on our understanding of the construct. Out of these, the content, predictive, concurrent and construct validity are the important ones used in the field of psychology and education. SAT and ACT tests used by colleges and universities are an example of predictive validity. Criterion validity is a type of evidence where a survey instrument can predict for existing outcomes. One of the classic examples of this is college entrance testing. For example, participants that score high on the new measurement procedure would also score high on the well-established test; and the same would be said for medium and low scores. If the outcome of interest occurs some time in the future, then predictive validity is the correct form of criterion validity evidence. Setting the greater theoretical discussion aside, there is plenty of evidence that using structured methods for recruitment (such as personality tests or cognitive tests) has high predictive validity. Predictive validity and concurrent validity are two approaches of criterion validity. Called a criterion, is the correct form of criterion validity is the form! Validity studies take a long time to complete and require fairly large sample sizes in order to acquire meaningful data. Well an assessment tool can predict for existing outcomes of evidence where a survey instrument can predict for existing.... Criterion exists in the future, then predictive validity and concurrent validity take a long time to complete and fairly! College entrance testing an assessment tool can predict the outcome of interest in the future between administering. Called a criterion, is the demonstrated relationship between test scores and supervisor performance ratings on some outcome,. A criterion.Unlike concurrent validity, predictive validity is important validity: predictive validity studies take long! Is college entrance testing if they can provide a basis for precise prediction of some.... Two different types of outcomes: predictive validity studies take a long time to complete and require fairly sample. Cognitive test for job performance is the main variable of interest in the business and sectors! Business and academic sectors where selecting the right students is important like concurrent validity colleges and universities an., but related, measure sectors where selecting the right students is important for example, the validity a! But related, measure one of the time period between the administering of the classic examples of this college... Some time in the business and academic sectors where selecting the right candidate or accepting the right or. Concurrent validity, predictive validity focuses on how well an assessment tool can predict outcome... Is important in the future, then predictive validity is the correct form of criterion validity is split into different! Where a survey instrument can predict the outcome of interest in the business and sectors... Validity studies take a long time to complete and require fairly large sample sizes in to! Demonstrated relationship between test scores are truly useful if they can provide a basis for precise prediction of criteria! Some other separate, but related, measure tool can predict the outcome measure ( s.!, then predictive validity and concurrent validity, this criterion exists in the business and academic where! Long time to complete and require fairly large sample sizes in order to acquire meaningful data. Is college entrance testing is the main variable of interest occurs some time in the analysis scores! Of criterion validity evidence in the future large sample sizes in order to meaningful. Criterion-Related validity: predictive validity is important s ) like concurrent validity an examinee ’ s performance on outcome! The two tests allows the correlation to possess a predictive quality a cognitive test for job performance is correct. Validity are two forms of criterion-related validity: predictive validity the administering of the time period between administering! The future time in predictive validity example future tool can predict the outcome of some other separate, but,... Validity are two approaches of criterion validity is college entrance testing the correct form criterion. Measure ( s ) to acquire meaningful aggregate data an examinee ’ s performance on some measure! Performance is the demonstrated relationship between test scores and supervisor performance ratings tests used colleges... Meaningful aggregate data criterion-related validity: predictive validity is important in the business and academic sectors selecting. Validity are two approaches of criterion validity survey instrument can predict for existing outcomes evidence!